← Home  /  Evidence
Evidence base

Built on peer-reviewed science, not vendor claims.

Every flag and reliability rating traces back to a primary source, with the PMID or dataset it came from. No black boxes.

The scale of the problem

Independent clinical studies establish that a meaningful share of pathogenic variants and Mendelian diagnoses are missed for technical, not biological, reasons.

Clinical scale & diagnostic impact
1 in 7
In clinical testing of 450,000+ patients, 13.8% of P/LP variants were technically challenging to detect by standard NGS — across segmental duplications, low-complexity regions, large indels, and CNVs (Lincoln et al. 2021, Genet Med).
1 in 3
In 4,577 molecularly characterized families, 34.3% encountered at least one diagnostic challenge — and applying a systematic framework to negative clinical sequencing reports resolved a substantial share of cases (AlAbdi et al. 2023, Nat Commun).
UDN
In an NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Network study, most participants could have been diagnosed with available clinical methods — the bottleneck was knowledge about test selection and gene-specific technical limitations (Cope et al. 2020, Mol Genet Genomic Med).
Caveats
Ten years of clinical whole-exome sequencing surfaced systematic mistakes and caveats — including alternate-contig multi-mapping artifacts and annotation drift as new transcripts are added (Corominas et al. 2022, Hum Mutat).
Sequencing methods & dead zones
HiFi
PacBio HiFi/CCS long reads resolve 152 of 193 medically-relevant NGS-problematic genes to 100% mappability — including GBA, PKD1, STRC, PMS2, and MYH7 — and achieve >99.9% SNV precision and recall vs GIAB benchmark (Wenger et al. 2019, Nat Biotechnol).
487
An exome-wide NGS dead-zone catalog defines genes impossible to analyze by standard NGS; 487 of them fall within the 4,964-gene medically-relevant panel. Four homology types are defined: same gene, different functional gene, pseudogene, non-CDS (Mandelker et al. 2016, Genet Med).
doi:10.1038/gim.2016.58
Dead zones
The same catalog identifies genes where even Sanger sequencing fails to provide orthogonal confirmation — a reminder that a "confirmatory" method can share the blind spot of the primary assay.
Mandelker et al. 2016
Reference assemblies & liftover
T2T
The first complete, gapless human genome sequence (T2T-CHM13) — the reference against which Blindspot computes assembly comparison and liftover analysis (Nurk et al. 2022, Science).
46.9%
A complete reference genome improves analysis of human genetic variation — the source for GRCh38-vs-CHM13 discordance, false-duplication gene pairs, and the medically-relevant gene impact table (Table S13) that Blindspot draws on (Aganezov et al. 2022, Science).
239
ClinVar liftover failures tracked in Blindspot's own Picard LiftoverVcf run — 239 P/LP variants cannot be located in T2T-CHM13, a reconstructed rate of ≈0.07% of GRCh38 P/LP variants.
NCBI ClinVar · internal pipeline
Reference datasets
GIAB
Genome in a Bottle difficult-region stratification (v3.6) — the segmental-duplication, GC-extreme, low-mappability, and tandem-repeat categories that drive Blindspot's exon-level overlays.
NIST Benchmark
MANE
MANE Select and RefSeq Select transcripts provide the exon / CDS / UTR structure overlaid on difficult regions — so a blind spot can be located to the exon, not just the gene.
NCBI / EMBL-EBI MANE
ClinGen
Gene–disease validity classifications and dosage-sensitivity curation — including refuted associations that flag genes that shouldn't be reported on a given panel.
clinicalgenome.org
ClinVar
The ClinVar 2026-05-30 release underpins Blindspot's pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variant set and the liftover-failure analysis across assemblies.
NCBI ClinVar

Trace any flag to its source.

Search a demo gene to see the mechanism and evidence behind each blind spot, or request access to the full base.

Request access
Blindspot Genetics is an informational and educational reference tool. It surfaces published, gene- and assembly-level sequencing limitations to support test selection and clinical understanding. It does not provide medical advice, make patient-specific recommendations, or replace confirmatory testing, laboratory judgment, or genetic counseling. Every figure is traceable to peer-reviewed literature or a documented internal pipeline.